3D-принтеры из смолы:SLA, DLP и LED-LCD

В последние годы 3D-печать светоотверждаемых полимеров набирает обороты и стала второй по популярности технологией 3D-печати после FFF. , как в профессиональной, так и в производственной среде. Этот бум стал результатом двух важных факторов. . С одной стороны, более низкая стоимость полимерных 3D-принтеров. в связи с появлением новых технологий поместил полимерные принтеры в один ценовой сегмент с FFF. С другой стороны, появление новых материалов таких как стоматологические, гибкие и инженерные смолы, позволили производить детали из смолы, которые ранее были жизнеспособны только с использованием FDM или SLS.

Основная сила 3D-печати смолой, которая привлекла внимание некоторых профессиональных секторов, таких какстоматология или ювелирное дело. , это высокое разрешение он способен достигать размеров от 50 мкм до 150 мкм по осям XY и от 30 мкм до 200 мкм по Z , что ниже минимального разрешения 3D-принтера FFF. В результате печатные детали из смолы имеют высокое качество поверхности и высокий уровень детализации. придавая им высокое эстетическое качество всех технологий аддитивного производства.

Основа для 3D-печати смолой

3D-печать смолой основана на принципе, совершенно отличном от того, который используется в большинстве технологий 3D-печати, таких как FFF или SLS. В то время как в них термопластичный полимер используется в качестве отправной точки и нагревается до температуры плавления для формирования детали,печать смолой основана на полимеризации реакционноспособной смеси мономеров и олигомеров путем избирательного воздействия света. Это означает, что вместо использования пластика в качестве сырья при печати смолой используются основные компоненты, из которых состоит пластик, а пластик образуется в результате химической реакции в процессе печати.

Смолы для 3D-печати в основном состоят из трех компонентов:

Мономеры и олигомеры: Это небольшие молекулы, которые реагируют друг с другом с образованием длинного полимера. цепи, которые являются основным компонентом пластика. Длина этих цепочек во многом будет определять их свойства

Агент перекрестных ссылок: Состоит из больших или меньших молекул с двумя или более реакционноспособными группами способны связываться в различных точках с полимерными цепями. Его функция заключается в том, чтобы цепочки были прочно соединены друг с другом. Как правило, пластмассы, образующиеся в присутствии сшивающих агентов, образуют так называемые термореактивные пластмассы или смолы.

Фотоинициатор: Это отвечает за ускорение реакции между мономерами или из них со сшивающим агентом. Это органические молекулы, обычно красители или флуорофоры, способные продуцировать катионы или свободные радикалы в присутствии света с заданной длиной волны, таким образом инициируя реакции радикальной или катионной полимеризации.

Свет, обычно синий (405 нм) или фиолетовый (365–385 нм), используется для активации фотоинициаторов и затвердевания смолы, поскольку это наиболее активная полоса в видимом спектре. Для этого в каждом слое подсвечиваются только те области, которые будут частью изделия.

Изображение 1:Спектр видимого света. Источник:Wikipedia.com

The 3D resin printing technologies are determined by the type of light source and the method of selective lighting used. Currently there are three common technologies:SLA, DLP and LED-LCD.

3D SLA printing

3D SLA or stereolithography printing is the oldest commercial 3D printing technology. It was developed during the first half of the 1980s and was patented in 1986 by 3D Systems founder Chuck Hull, just three years before Stratasys founder Scott Crump patented FDM technology.

In 3D SLA printing, the resin is cured using a laser beam between 150 and 300 µm in diameter. The laser sweeps the surface of each layer using a moving mirror system called a galvanometer. The main advantage of this technology is the high precision it can achieve , especially in the central area of the construction platform, which is only surpassed by SLS technology.

Image 2:SLA printing process. Source 3Dhubs.com

Another of its advantages, derived in part from this high precision, is that it achieves a superior surface finish to that obtained in DLP and LED-LCDs as it does not present the staircase effect that can be seen in the latter.

Image 3:Surface finish in 3D SLA and DLP printing. Source:Formlabs.com

However, not everything is an advantage, as this is the slowest resin printing technology. For each layer it is necessary to sweep the entire surface of the part with the laser, which is a slow process, which increases the more parts we position in the construction space. In addition, it is necessary to keep the sweeping speeds within a specific range, as very high speeds would result in a loss of precision, the main strength of this technology.

Video 1:How SLA printing works Source:Formlabs.com

This is the technology used by the renowned Formlabs printers , the benchmark brand for resin printing. Printers such as Form 3 or Form 3B use this technology in conjunction with high precision galvanometers to offer the highest quality standards in critical sectors such as high jewellery, dentistry or medicine.

Image 4:Form 3B printer. Font:Formlabs.com

3D DLP printing

DLP 3D printing technology was developed with the aim of reducing 3D resin printing times . Instead of sweeping the surface of the part with a laser, the entire layer is projected simultaneously using a light source, a device consisting of a moving micro-mirror array known as a DMD (Digital Micromirror Device) and a set of lenses responsible for projecting the image onto the resin.

Video 2:How a DMD works. Source:TI.com

This technology was a revolution , since each layer is formed in a few seconds and the printing time is independent of the number of pieces placed on the base, only of the height of these.

Its main disadvantage is that the printing resolution is determined by the density of micro-mirrors that form the DMD and the projected surface. For the same DMD system, a larger printing surface will always result in a proportional decrease in resolution, which is not the case with SLA systems, where the resolution is determined by the diameter of the laser beam and is independent of the printing surface.

In addition, the use of projection lenses can cause distortions in areas far from the centre , which are greater the larger the construction size. It is possible to correct these distortions by using more complex optical systems, however, they often make the device very expensive and therefore not very popular.

The surface quality of the pieces is usually slightly lower than those produced by SLA, and in many cases the staircase effect appears.

Image 5:Staircase effect derived from the use of square voxels in DLP Source:theorthocosmos.com

Although printing times were critically shortened, this technology did not displace SLA technology. Today, it is a technology that has fallen into disuse, displaced mainly by the appearance of LED-LCD technology.

3D LED-LCD or MSLA printing

It is the latest technology to reach the market and has experienced significant growth in recent years. It was developed as an evolution of DLP technology , and today has virtually replaced it.

Operation is similar to DLP technology, however, instead of reflecting light using a digital micromirror device (DMD), it uses an LCD device in which each pixel acts as a small window that blocks or lets light through.

Image 6:SLA vs DLP vs MSLA. Source:theorthocosmos.com

LCD devices are the same as those used in mobile screens or TV or computer panels, so the cost is much lower than that of DMD devices. In addition, they are available in sizes from 3" to 80", so the projection is direct and perpendicular to the base over the entire surface. This avoids the use of expensive and complex projection lens systems and the distortions they cause in DLP produced parts.

Among its main advantages are its high printing speed and low cost . In addition, it outperforms DLP technology in two key ways. As noted above, perpendicular projection prevents distortion from the oblique projection provided by lenses in DLP systems. Secondly, LCD devices not only block or allow light to pass through, but can also filter it by varying the light intensity independently at each pixel. This makes it possible to use anti-aliasing processes that reduce the staircase effect and allow for surface qualities very close to those obtained by SLA

.

Image 7:Sub-pixel or anti-aliasing sampling to avoid staircase effect Source:hackaday.com

All of this has meant that its growth in recent years has not only displaced DLP technology but is beginning to replace SLA technology in industries such as dentistry, where SLA technology is a standard.

One of the main drawbacks is the high level of heating produced by the LED matrixes used , which means that effective cooling systems must be implemented to prevent the resin from heating up in long prints.

Image 8:Liquid cooling system of a Uniz printer. Source:Uniz.com

It is the technology present in all low-cost resin 3D printers and also the latest professional models such as the Uniz Slash.

Image 9:Uniz Slash Plus printer. Source:Uniz.com

Which technology to choose

Today the dilemma could be reduced to two technologies:SLA or LED-LCD.

Despite the growth of LED-LCD technology, SLA technology is still the majority in professional environments. There are two reasons for this, firstly the high quality and accuracy achieved by SLA with printers such as Formlabs is difficult to match. On the other hand, new technologies need a transition period to make room in companies due to the need to amortise current equipment and the distrust of new systems with low implementation in their sector.

However, the new professional LED-LCD printers, such as the Uniz, can provide an important competitive advantage by allowing small series to be produced with a quality similar to SLA and in a fraction of the time. For example, in the production of models for lost-wax moulding, which is widely used in some branches of the jewellery industry and which can lead to significant savings, not only in time and resources, but also in costs.

The decision between one or the other must be based on the user's needs between precision and production capacity. In many cases they should be thought of not as rival technologies, but as complementary, having a team dedicated to the production of small series and another for more delicate and precise works.